
BridgeRatings: Dave Van Dyke
Radio has never had more data.
We track minute-by-minute behavior. We analyze PPM curves. We run auditorium tests. We crowdsource opinions. We A/B digital copy. We obsess over what causes tune-out.
And yet…What if the real problem isn’t the answers we’re getting — but the questions we’re asking?
Most of our research is built around risk reduction.
- -Does this song test well?
- -Does this topic cause tune-out?
- -Is this break too long?
- -Is this promo clear?
- -Is this contest appealing?
All valid.
- But notice the pattern: we’re asking questions designed to avoid loss.
- When was the last time we asked questions designed to create love?
The Safe Questions
- Ratings-focused environments — especially in a post-consolidation world — naturally drift toward caution. Stability rewards predictability. Predictability reduces offense. Reduced offense protects shares. But protection isn’t growth.
If distinction drives growth, then our research must explore distinction — not just durability.
Instead of asking:
- “Does this bother you?”
- What if we asked:
- “What makes you feel something when you listen?”
- Instead of:
- “How likely are you to keep listening?”
What if we asked: “When do you talk about us to someone else?” Instead of:
- “Do you like this air talent?”
- What if we asked:
- “What makes an air talent feel indispensable to you?”
- Those are different questions. They aim at emotional connection, not just tolerance.
- The Questions That Hurt (But Matter)
Here are a few we rarely ask — and probably should: -If our station disappeared tomorrow, what would you actually miss?
- -When do we sound fearless?
- -What do we do that streaming can’t?
- -What do we do that streaming does better?
- -When do you feel we are truly local?
- -When do we feel corporate?
That last one is uncomfortable. Which is exactly why it’s powerful.
- Most research measures satisfaction.
- Very little measures attachment.
- Beyond Avoiding Tune-Out
For years, radio optimized around preventing negatives. That was smart in a PPM world. But optimization culture has a side effect:
- -It trims edges.
- -It sands personality.
- -It standardizes sound.
Eventually, you end up asking: “Is this acceptable?” instead of “Is this remarkable?”
Listeners don’t build habits around acceptable. They build habits around meaning.
If we want stronger brands — not just stable ratings — our research must uncover:
- -What creates identity?
- -What builds belonging?
- -What triggers pride?
- -What earns advocacy?
- Because loyalty isn’t passive. It’s active.
- The Growth Question
Here’s the ultimate one:
- “What would make this station feel made for you?”
- Not formatted for you.
- Not targeted to you.
- Made for you.
That question forces us to confront creativity, community, and courage.
- And maybe that’s the shift.
- We’ve spent years asking how to avoid losing listeners.
- Maybe it’s time to start asking what would make them choose us — intentionally.
What questions are we not asking?

You must be logged in to post a comment.