
BridgeRatings: Dave Van Dyke, dvd@bridgeratings.com
Here’s a question that made me change stations this week. One of my all-time favorite songs came on the radio. I listened for about ten seconds… and turned it off. A few minutes later, another station played another one of my favorite songs. I turned that one off, too. Not because I don’t love those songs. Because I’ve heard them too many times.
That got me thinking. After forty years of playing the same classic hits, has music radio accidentally worn out some of the greatest songs ever recorded?
Psychologists have long studied something called the mere exposure effect. In simple terms, familiarity increases enjoyment—up to a point. The more we hear something, the more we tend to like it.
Until we don’t. Eventually the curve bends downward. Familiarity becomes predictability. Predictability becomes boredom. Surprise disappears. The emotional connection weakens.
I wonder if that’s exactly where Classic Hits radio finds itself today.
Think about it. How many times have you heard Don’t Stop Believin’, Hotel California, Sweet Home Alabama, or Livin’ on a Prayer? Not twenty times. Not a hundred. Probably thousands.
No restaurant could serve you the exact same meal every week for forty years and expect you to remain excited about it. Yet radio has often operated under the assumption that a great song is immune to overexposure. I’m no longer convinced that’s true.
The songs didn’t change. Our relationship with them did. Ironically, many of these songs became classics because they once created anticipation. You hoped they’d come on. You waited for them. They felt special because they weren’t guaranteed.
Today, many listeners can predict half the next hour before it plays. That’s not familiarity. That’s routine. There’s an important difference. The streaming era has taught us something valuable. People don’t necessarily want access to millions of songs. They want music that still feels emotionally alive. Sometimes that means hearing a favorite less often. Sometimes it means hearing one you haven’t thought about in years. Sometimes it simply means allowing enough time for anticipation to rebuild.
Scarcity creates desire. Overexposure destroys it. This isn’t an argument for abandoning familiar music. Quite the opposite. It’s an argument for protecting it. Great songs are valuable assets. Every unnecessary spin spends a little of that value. Eventually, even masterpieces can become background noise—not because they stopped being great, but because we’ve stopped hearing them.
Maybe the biggest programming question for the next few years isn’t, “What songs should we play?” Maybe it’s…”What great songs are we playing too often?” Because listeners don’t fall out of love with great music overnight. Sometimes they simply hear it one time too many.

You must be logged in to post a comment.